Knowledge · Immigration
The short answer No — neither Bill is law. Both were introduced in a previous parliamentary session but not passed before Parliament was dissolved for the 2026 election. They have been re-introduced and must complete the parliamentary process anew. Current law governs every application made today. If enacted, the Bills would introduce a points-based route to permanent residence, put "reside" and "reside and work" permits on a statutory footing, let some immigrant-status holders register directly as citizens, and extend citizenship by descent to great-grandchildren born overseas.
Because the timing question is real and clients are already facing it. If you have held immigrant status for three years, the Citizenship Bill would offer you direct registration — but it does not exist yet, and there is no published commencement date. Do you apply under the current law now, or wait for a reform that may pass this session, next session, or in an amended form?
There is no general answer. It turns on how close you are to qualifying under existing law, what the cost of delay is to you, and how much of your position depends on the new categories rather than the old ones. What we can do is set out both scenarios with dates against them, so the decision is an informed one.
Do not let a permit lapse in anticipation of the new regime. Continuity of lawful status is valuable under the current law and under the proposed one, and a gap is difficult to repair in either. Whatever the reform eventually says, the person with an unbroken record will be better placed than the person who paused and waited.
A Bill has no legal effect. Until it completes the parliamentary process and is brought into force, it changes nothing about how an application is decided, and officials continue to apply the existing law. Neither of these Bills has completed that process — they fell when Parliament was dissolved for the 2026 election and have been re-introduced, which means starting again rather than resuming.
Even passage is not the end of the question. A Bill that passes may be amended along the way, and a statute that receives assent still requires commencement, which can follow at an interval and can be staged so that different provisions begin on different dates. Transitional provisions then determine how the new regime treats people already part-way through the old one — and none have been published here.
The practical consequence is that nobody, including us, can tell you today what the law will say when it eventually changes, or when that will be.
The temptation is to wait for a regime that looks more favourable to you. That reasoning is sound only if you know both what the new regime will say and when it will arrive, and at present neither is knowable.
The more robust approach is to keep your position strong under the law as it actually stands: maintain unbroken lawful status, keep documenting residence, and apply when you qualify under current rules rather than deferring on a forecast. If reform then arrives and improves your position, you are well placed to take advantage of it. If it is delayed by years, amended in ways nobody anticipated, or never commenced at all, you have lost nothing.
This information is general guidance, not legal advice, and reflects requirements as at the review date shown above. Law, fees, and procedure change. For advice on your specific situation, book a consultation with Aythawn International Law Chambers — +1 246-417-0839.